Comparison of the imaging quality of the HyperSight CBCT system and conventional kV-CBCT on the TrueBeam accelerator using the Catphan phantom
PDF (Polish)

Keywords

HyperSight
CBCT
Catphan
image quality
IGRT

How to Cite

Sanocka, Karolina, Olga Jankowiak, Ewelina Nowak, Zuzanna Wróblewicz, Sebastian Gajny, and Bartosz Pawałowski. 2026. “Comparison of the Imaging Quality of the HyperSight CBCT System and Conventional KV-CBCT on the TrueBeam Accelerator Using the Catphan Phantom”. Letters in Oncology Science 23 (2). https://doi.org/10.21641/los.2026.1.1.274.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the imaging quality of the HyperSight CBCT system compared to conventional kV-CBCT, using the Head, Pelvis, and Thorax protocols.

Materials and Methods: The Catphan phantom was imaged on two TrueBeam accelerators-equipped with the HyperSight CBCT system and a conventional kV-CBCT system, respectively. High-contrast and low-contrast resolution, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, and consistency of HU values ​​for standard material inserts were assessed.

Results: Compared to conventional kV-CBCT, the HyperSight CBCT system demonstrated lower noise, higher SNR, and better image uniformity in all analyzed protocols. The Head protocol also achieved better high-contrast resolution and improved visibility of low-contrast objects at 1.0% contrast. Analysis of HU values ​​revealed differences in the imaging of individual materials, with conventional kV-CBCT typically achieving higher HU values, particularly for Teflon and Delrin. Low-contrast resolution depended on the protocol used.

Conclusions: HyperSight CBCT improved selected image quality parameters compared to conventional kV-CBCT, particularly noise, SNR, uniformity, and some resolution parameters. The extent of improvement depended on the acquisition protocol and the parameter assessed, confirming the need for separate evaluation of each clinical protocol.

PDF (Polish)

References

1. Kim E, Park YK, Zhao T, Laugeman E, Zhao XN, Hao Y, et al. Image quality characterization of an ultra-high-speed kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging system on an O-ring linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024;25(5): e14337. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14337.

2. Lustermans D, Fonseca GP, Taasti VT, van de Schoot A, Petit SF, van Elmpt WJC, et al. Image quality evaluation of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imager. Phys Med Biol. 2024;69(10):105018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad3cb0.

3. Agulles-Pedrós L, MacDonald RL, Cherpak AJ, Dixit N, Dong L, Zhao T, et al. Multi-institutional study on image quality for a novel CBCT solution on O-ring linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2025;26(6): e70023. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70023.

4. Zhao H, Nelson G, Sarkar V, Oare C, Szegedi M, St James S, et al. Comprehensive image quality evaluation and motion phantom studies of an ultra-fast 6-second cone-beam computed tomography imaging system on a ring gantry linear accelerator. Adv Radiat Oncol 2025;10(2):101681. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101681.

5. Arsenault TH, Arrue J, Gregg K, Baydoun A, Rezai A, Langmack C, et al. Characterization of a prototype rapid kilovoltage x-ray image guidance system designed for a linear accelerator radiation therapy unit. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025;26: e70060. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70060.

6. Phantom Laboratory. Catphan 604 Product Guide (CTP604). Greenwich, NY: Phantom Laboratory; 2025. (22-January-2025).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Letters in Oncology Science

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.