Abstract
Aim
The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of geometric verification by determining systematic and random errors to establish the setup margins (SM) for patient positioning uncertainty in a group of lung cancer patients.
Material and Method
The study included 20 patients treated with the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique with respiratory gating. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The Planned Target Volume (PTV) averaged 247.62 cm³ (range 62.10–562.10 cm³). The PTV volume included the anatomical volume, accounting for tumor positions due to respiratory motion (Internal Target Volume, ITV), which was defined based on 4DCT (Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography) imaging at selected respiratory phases covering inhalation ±20% of the respiratory cycle, along with a setup margin (SM) of 0.5 cm. Respiratory motion was monitored using the Real-time Position Management (RPM) System. Patients were positioned with their arms above their heads using dedicated immobilization to stabilize the patient’s position. During each fraction, the patient's position was verified based on Cone Beam CT (CBCT) in four dimensions (4D CBCT). Based on the collected shift results in the cranio-caudal (Lng), anterior-posterior (Ver), and left-right (Lat) axes, the displacement vector (V) was calculated, as well as the systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors. Using these errors and applying the van Herk formula (PTV margin = 2.5∑ + 0.7σ), the setup margin (SM) was determined [van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque JV. The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1121-35].
Results
600 geometric shift results were collected, with the mean values and standard deviations in the respective axes (Lng, Ver, Lat) being 0.192 ± 0.241 cm, 0.047 ± 0.234 cm, and 0.020 ± 0.239 cm, respectively. The displacement vector (V) was 0.425 ± 0.169 cm. The systematic error (∑) in each axis was 0.134 cm, 0.139 cm, and 0.136 cm, while the random error (σ) was 0.236 cm, 0.220 cm, and 0.233 cm. Based on these values, the SM margin was calculated to be 0.499 cm, 0.500 cm, and 0.502 cm, respectively.
Conclusions
Based on the obtained results of geometric verification, it was concluded that for the applied patient positioning method for lung cancer patients treated with VMAT and respiratory gating, the adopted setup margin (SM) of 0.5 cm is consistent with the margin determined from the analyzed results of geometric verification.
References
[1.] Narodowy Instytut Onkologii. Nowotwory płuca i opłucnej – leczenie. [Internet]. [cyt. 2025 maj 8]. Dostępne na: https://onkologia.org.pl/pl/nowotwory-pluca-i-oplucnej-leczenie#page-main-image
[2.] Chorostowska-Wynimko J, Krenke R, Antczak A, et al. Kompleksowa diagnostyka raka płuca: koncepcja i model funkcjonalny. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2020;1(1):85–92.
[3.] Bertholet J, Knopf A, Eiben B, et al. Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(15). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ba8
[4.] Hoskin P, Gaze M, Greener T. On Target: Ensuring Geometric Accuracy in Radiotherapy. The Royal College of Radiologists; London: 2008. p. 11–13.
[5.] Wolthaus JWH. Comparison of different strategies to use four-dimensional computed tomography in treatment planning for lung cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(4):1229–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.042
[6.] AAPM Task Group 76. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology. Med Phys. 2006 Jul;33(7):3874–900.
[7.] Kumar M, Shanavas S, Sidappa A, et al. Cone Beam Computed Tomography – Know its secrets. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(2):64–8.
[8.] Sajja S, Lee Y, Ericsson M, et al. Technical principles of dual-energy cone beam computed tomography and clinical applications for radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;5(1):1–16.
[9.] Iliopoulos P, Simopoulou S, Simopoulos A, et al. Review on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) dose in patients undergoing image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). In: Advances in Dosimetry and New Trends in Radiopharmaceuticals; 2023.
[10.] Topczewska-Bruns J, Filipowski T, Chrzanowicz R, et al. Zastosowanie radioterapii sterowanej obrazem (IGRT) za pomocą kilowoltowej stożkowej tomografii komputerowej (kV CBCT) w codziennej praktyce klinicznej.
[11.] Wróbel D, Skrobała A, Piotrowski T. Analiza wyników weryfikacji geometrycznej obrazów megawoltowych u pacjentek napromienianych w obszarze lewego gruczołu piersiowego. Zesz Nauk WCO. Letters in Oncology Science. 2014;11:53–60.
[12.] van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque JV. The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1121–35.
[13.] Yoon K, Jeong C, Kim SW, Cho B, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of respiratory gated volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using 3D printing technology. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208685
[14.] Wagman R, Yorke E, Ford E, Giraud P, et al. Respiratory gating for liver tumors: use in dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(3):659–68. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03941-X
[15.] Didkowska J, Barańska K, Miklewska MJ, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in Poland in 2023. Nowotwory J Oncol. 2024;74(2):75–93.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Letters in Oncology Science