Porównanie objętości narządów krytycznych z obszaru mózgowia wyznaczonych manualnie i automatycznie dla trzech systemów planowania leczenia: Comparison of the volumes of organs at risk for the brain tumors determined manually and automatically for the three treatment planning systems

Versions

PDF (Polish)

Keywords

radiotherapy
brain tumors
auto-contouring
organs at risk
treatment planning

How to Cite

Styś, Sara, Magdalena Charmacińska, and Agnieszka Skrobała. (2021) 2021. “Porównanie objętości narządów Krytycznych Z Obszaru mózgowia Wyznaczonych Manualnie I Automatycznie Dla Trzech systemów Planowania Leczenia: Comparison of the Volumes of Organs at Risk for the Brain Tumors Determined Manually and Automatically for the Three Treatment Planning Systems ”. Letters in Oncology Science 18 (2). https://doi.org/10.21641/los.2021.18.2.203.

Abstract

In Poland, brain tumors account for 2% of all malignant tumors, and radiotherapy plays an important role in their treatment. The area of the brain is unique due to the proximity of adjacent important organs. One of the most important steps in the treatment preparation process is contouring the organs at risk. The study examined the differences between the volumes of critical organs determined manually in the Eclipse (Varian) treatment planning system and the implemented tools for automatic determination of structures in the iPlan (BrainLab) and MultiPlan (Accuray) treatment planning systems. It has been shown that the volumes of structures determined manually are greater than those determined automatically; however, these differences do not significantly affect the treatment process and patient safety.

PDF (Polish)

References

Krajowy rejestr nowotworów. http://onkologia.org.pl.

Kordek R. Onkologia. Podręcznik dla studentów i lekarzy. Wyd. trzecie, poprawione, Via Medica: Gdańsk 2007.

http://www.doctormed.pl/wydzial/300/artykul/427/Nowotwory%20centralnego%20uk%C5%82adu%20nerwowego.

Crevoisier R, Pierga JY, Dendale R, et al. Radiotherapy of glioblastoma, Cancer Radiother 1997;1:194-207.

Wen PY, Weller M, Quant Lee E, et al. Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 2020 Aug 17;22:1073-113.

Kruser TJ, Bosch WR, Badiyan SN, et al. NRG brain tumor specialists consensus guidelines for glioblastoma contouring. J Neurooncol. 2019;143:157-66.

Shah JL, Li G, Shaffer JL, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma. Neurosurgery. 2018;82:24-34.

Barani IJ, Larson DA. Radiation therapy of glioblastoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2015;163:49-73.

Lillie O'Steen, Robert J Amdur. An approach to contouring the dorsal vagal complex for radiotherapy planning. Med Dosim . Spring 2016;41:7-8.

Niyazi M, Brada M, Chalmers AJ, et al. ESTRO-ACROP guideline "target delineation of glioblastomas". Radiother Oncol. 2016;118:35-42.

ICRU Report 50. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 1993.

Yamazaki H, Shiomi H, Tsubokura T, et al. Quantitative assessment of inter-observer variability in target volume delineation on stereotactic radiotherapy treatment for pituitary adenoma and meningioma near optic tract. Radiat Oncol . 2011;610.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Letters in Oncology Science

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.